Comments on: REC Silicon shuts down Moses Lake polysilicon plant Hanwha's attempt at 100% American supply chain may be dashed. /2024/12/rec-silicon-shuts-down-moses-lake-polysilicon-plant/ Covering the world of solar power technology, development and installation. Tue, 11 Feb 2025 19:24:10 +0000 hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=6.7.2 By: John Meister /2024/12/rec-silicon-shuts-down-moses-lake-polysilicon-plant/#comment-149167 Tue, 11 Feb 2025 19:24:10 +0000 /?p=108220#comment-149167 The fault for REC Silicon closing the Moses Lake facility falls on REC management. Stock holders and customers thought that REC knew how to make (quality – conformance to specifications) polysilicon.
They did not. They never really informed stock holders of the root cause, but Hanwha was most likely informed because they are on the board.

Was the root cause, improper equipment material? lack of system cleaning / passivation prior to start up? or was it operational? Whatever it was, they should tell all of the share holders. Don’t blame Hanwha for expecting conformance to requirements.

]]>
By: Johnny5 /2024/12/rec-silicon-shuts-down-moses-lake-polysilicon-plant/#comment-148540 Fri, 03 Jan 2025 04:59:41 +0000 /?p=108220#comment-148540 My opinion on how this start up failed: Too many hands in the pocket, digging for gold…
I was hired at REC recently and for my professional experience in product handling, there was zero proper training in how poly should be handled or packaged. This company used German and Italian machines in their handling and not one person had complete knowledge experience or control on how to use the equipment. 50% of the people hired to work there actually cared about the job. The other half were only there because of how the public perceived the company as the “best paying job” in the area. Again, to many young kids hired thinking they know how the industrial game works with zero proper training.

]]>
By: Mr. Sublime /2024/12/rec-silicon-shuts-down-moses-lake-polysilicon-plant/#comment-148520 Wed, 01 Jan 2025 21:12:31 +0000 /?p=108220#comment-148520 Agreed. There have been many improvements made to the process since the first qualification sample was sent, and why Q-cells elected not to send another sample for qualification is indeed a mystery.
With all the new equipment and processes installed at REC to meet Hanwha’s requirements, it takes some amount of time after start-up to get everything synced-up and operating as designed. It’s not like a light switch that you turn on and it all works perfectly.
With all the money that Hanwha has invested in REC, it’s hard to believe that they would essentially just walk away?

]]>
By: Johan Bastion /2024/12/rec-silicon-shuts-down-moses-lake-polysilicon-plant/#comment-148513 Wed, 01 Jan 2025 14:24:44 +0000 /?p=108220#comment-148513 Hanwha needs to kill the old expensive baby so the new DOE funded baby can survive better. #S Korea Business is ruthless.. Qcells is their lead horse and probably had less margin using REC.

]]>
By: Solarman2 /2024/12/rec-silicon-shuts-down-moses-lake-polysilicon-plant/#comment-148511 Wed, 01 Jan 2025 13:14:30 +0000 /?p=108220#comment-148511 Moses Lake as a silicon foundry seems to have had multiple problems over the years. On again off again manufacturing at the site, promises not kept by the likes of Violet Power that was ‘going’ to have a solar PV cell and panel manufacturing fab right across the street from the silicon foundry, didn’t flesh out.

Perhaps it is time for an entity like the SEC to get involved in this REC foundry to scrutinize the operation from management to investments by others. IF the proposition doesn’t work time and time again, one needs to revisit the “premise” of the entire business incorporation. Just sayin’.

]]>
By: Armando /2024/12/rec-silicon-shuts-down-moses-lake-polysilicon-plant/#comment-148504 Tue, 31 Dec 2024 18:02:50 +0000 /?p=108220#comment-148504 Hi

I see that you have written an article about REC today.

Therefore, I would like to send you some info and hope that you will be able to dig up the real truth for us shareholders in REC and the market in general as REC is a listed company in Norway.

REC has spent over 5-600 million dollars to restart the ML department, and has hired several hundred new employees, and has spent a lot of money on training and large-scale production, then to close it all before it even got started.

Because the one China test says that the quality is not good enough. This is unrealistic So yes, it smells very bad and everything indicates that it is not the truth in this matter. Why did the customer, which is Q-Cells and which again through Hanwha controls both sides of the table, choose to send REC’s raw materials to be tested in China?

For some reason, the customer did not want to tell the market and REC which country they had sent the product for testing, but then after 5-7 weeks of waiting, a stock exchange announcement comes that REC’s products have been stopped in Chinese customs. We know that REC had to close the ML department in 2019 due to the Chinese tariff on products from REC.

Why would the testing company in China, which is governed by their regime, want REC’s product to be approved, when they do not want companies in the US in general to fail? And in the stock exchange announcement on September 13, REC confirms that the quality is accepted by both the customer and REC, but that it is only a formality to test the product.?

On December 17, the test results come from the Chinese company and of course we know the answer in advance where they believe the purity is not terrible. In the same announcement, REC management says that sometimes it takes more tests to get it approved, which is why REC has used this long waiting time to work on the quality and is preparing a new batch for testing.

But then comes the message just a few days later that gives everyone a shock that they can’t go ahead with it because the customer who is Hanhwa doesn’t want to wait any longer. It’s a shame for all those who have wasted their time sending the goods to China, who spent over 3 months for a false result.

Therefore, we small savers who are sitting with over 90% loss want you to be able to focus on this matter so that someone intervenes from the authorities in the US.

Hanwha is looking for something in REC, maybe they will drive it completely down, which they have managed to do and come up with some shameful bids. We want a fair and equal treatment of all shareholders.

With kind regards

Armando

Has REC Silicon been taken hostage by its shareholder Hanwha? After investing umpteen millions in the upgrade of its fluidized bed reactors (#FBR technology) and post-treatment systems for granular #polysilicon in Moses Lake, Washington (USA), REC Silicon suddenly announced on December 30 that it would cease its polysilicon production. The decision comes after a first qualification test for REC Silicon’s granular material in #China failed in December. The company’s argument, however, that its only polysilicon customer Qcells USA Corp., a subsidiary of Hanwha Group, “is not able to wait any longer for delivery of product” is strange as the start-up of #ingot and #wafer production at Qcells has been delayed to mid-2025. And there are more crudities. Something smells foul here. Retail shareholders sense a dirty game by Hanwha, which owns a 33% stake in REC Silicon, to take control of the company at their expense – see the comments by Armando Tyria on LinkedIn: https://lnkd.in/em8br54D

https://www.linkedin.com/posts/johannesbernreuter_fbr-polysilicon-china-activity-7279819228621279232-SBT4?utm_source=share&utm_medium=member_ios

REC Silicon – Results of Qualification Test
17/12/2024, 19:10:00
Regulatory
Moses Lake, Washington USA December 17, 2024: REC Silicon ASA (“REC Silicon” or the “Company”) has now received the results from the qualification test for its ultra-high purity polysilicon from the recently restarted silane-based high-purity granular production facility in Moses Lake, Washington.

The Company was notified yesterday by its customer of the results from the qualification test that was completed earlier this month through a third-party testing partner. Unfortunately, due to the impurity issues in the qualification material sent, the customer deemed the test to be unsuccessful. This was due to lower-than-expected levels of crystallization and the ingot yield observed in the testing runs, which the customer deemed not to be acceptable for their production process at this stage. The Company is in discussions with its customer to determine the feasibility of another test which will be contingent upon the Company making improvements in the manufacturing process at Moses Lake. The timing and likelihood of achieving the necessary improvements is uncertain at this point in time.

As a result of the unsuccessful qualification test, REC Silicon is reviewing multiple strategic options. This may include additional operational adjustments, contractual re-negotiations, and other mitigative actions.

REC Silicon continues to work on additional financing to ensure the Company’s financial flexibility. The Company will provide additional operational and financing details when such information becomes available.

REC Silicon – Update Regarding First Shipment of Ultra-High Purity Polysilicon
13/09/2024, 16:28:00
Regulatory
Moses Lake, Washington USA – September 13, 2024: REC Silicon ASA (“REC Silicon” or the “Company”) provides an operational update concerning the first shipment of ultra-high purity polysilicon from the recently restarted silane-based high-purity granular production facility in Moses Lake, Washington.

The Company is pleased to announce that following a series of modifications and mitigations in our process aimed at addressing a previously announced issue around higher than expected levels of an impurity in the product, all impurities have now been reduced to levels that are acceptable to our customer, and we have an agreement in principle to modify a specification subject to a final evaluation and qualification test, as is typical in the industry after such a modification.

The plant is running well, and the facility is now producing volumes for commercial shipments. Even though our production volumes are being ramped to the necessary level already, the first commercial shipment of product will need to be delayed to mid-October, to accommodate this final qualification step that our customer is undertaking.

Additionally, we can confirm that construction activities related to the restart of the Moses Lake facility are complete, including Silane IV and equipment will be started as needed during the planned ramp of capacity.

“Getting to this point and mitigating the previous impurity issue was the result of hard work by many dedicated personnel of the Company. We will soon be beginning a new phase for the facility where efforts are transitioning to continuous quality improvement to exceed the market standard, ramp-up, and optimization. There is still a large amount of work to be accomplished. We will strive to reach our full commercial production capacity as soon as we can while maintaining our focus on product quality. We appreciate the interactions with our customer in getting to this stage, our discussions have always centered around our aligned interests of our polysilicon enabling their efforts to create a complete PV solar value chain in the USA. This is demonstrably a positive outcome for both parties” says CEO Kurt Levens.

As a leading producer of silane gases and silicon materials, REC Silicon is well positioned to capitalize on the global megatrends of digitalization, energy transition and energy storage. The Company has developed a strong market position in the Semiconductor industry based on its operations in Butte, Montana. The successful restart of Moses Lake operations will enable REC Silicon to provide ultra-high purity polysilicon to the US solar value chain currently under construction while the Company also expects to supply silane gas in significant volumes for anode materials to a fast-growing battery industry.

Contacts

]]>