{"id":100477,"date":"2022-11-16T10:31:45","date_gmt":"2022-11-16T15:31:45","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/\/?p=100477"},"modified":"2022-11-16T10:44:28","modified_gmt":"2022-11-16T15:44:28","slug":"over-240-solar-companies-ask-commerce-to-toss-anticircumvention-case","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/\/2022\/11\/over-240-solar-companies-ask-commerce-to-toss-anticircumvention-case\/","title":{"rendered":"Over 240 solar companies ask Commerce to toss AD\/CVD circumvention case"},"content":{"rendered":"
With an expected preliminary decision on the Dept. of Commerce’s AD\/CVD circumvention investigation pushed to Dec. 1, SEIA and 240 solar companies have sent a letter<\/a> to Commerce Sec. Gina Raimondo requesting she reject the original petition.<\/p>\n Credit: Namaste Solar<\/p><\/div>\n The Commerce investigation started in\u00a0March 2022<\/a>\u00a0after California-based solar panel assembler Auxin Solar\u00a0petitioned<\/a> for a review of Chinese solar panel manufacturers moving portions of their manufacturing operations to Southeast Asia as a way to circumvent anti-dumping\/countervailing duties (AD\/CVD) in place against Chinese solar manufacturers since 2012<\/a>. Specifically, Auxin wanted a deeper look at solar operations in Cambodia, Malaysia, Thailand and Vietnam to determine if Chinese wafers, aluminum frames, backsheets and more\u00a0have been used<\/a>\u00a0in exported cells and modules. If enough Chinese product is found in Southeast Asian module exports, DOC could extend the AD\/CVD to the mentioned countries.<\/p>\n<\/a>