{"id":106140,"date":"2024-06-13T13:43:24","date_gmt":"2024-06-13T17:43:24","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/\/?p=106140"},"modified":"2024-06-13T13:45:52","modified_gmt":"2024-06-13T17:45:52","slug":"3-reasons-you-need-both-remote-on-site-data-for-installing-solar","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/\/2024\/06\/3-reasons-you-need-both-remote-on-site-data-for-installing-solar\/","title":{"rendered":"3 Reasons You Need Both Remote + On-Site Data For Installing Solar"},"content":{"rendered":"

\"\"<\/p>\n

Key takeaway:<\/strong> Combining remote and on-site data ensures accurate system sizing, production estimates, and hardware costs.<\/p>\n

Making a preliminary design is beneficial for sales conversations while finalizing your design with on-site data is essential for everything to follow. If you use an all-in-one software like Scanifly, you have the speed of remote layouts and the precision of drone-based final designs.<\/p>\n


\n

Sales proposals almost always leverage data from satellite or remote imagery \u2026 but there\u2019s a problem. Solar professionals overwhelmingly report satellite imagery is not entirely accurate<\/a> and needs to be verified on-site.<\/p>\n

However, just saying \u201csatellite imagery is inaccurate\u201d leads to other questions:<\/p>\n